Bryant said Neil Entwistle's DNA matched semen cells found on the inside of Rachel Entwistle's underwear.
Got to love it.
The Medical Examiner is supposed to be on the stand tomorrow, once the cross-examination of the computer forensics expert is over. Maybe the ME can shed some light on the above-quoted tidbit. On the face of it, it looks as if Neil and Rachel had sex before he killed her. Possibly even anal sex, as I've read that a peri-anal swab produced mixed DNA from the two of them.
Now, please pardon the graphic mental image created by these words, but let's consider that possibility for a moment. Add in the information that Rachel's shirt was torn.
I hope the ME has another explanation besides the one or two I'm thinking about.
The first is that, knowing he was going to kill her, he raped her fore and aft, and then shot her in the head. The second is that he did that after he shot her. If the latter is true, he is even sicker than I thought.
The above is my opinion only, and the man is still on trial. He could yet be proven innocent, but somehow, I doubt it.
This site has updates, and there are some clips from the trial on YouTube.
Sky News
That sick sack of sh*t!
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad his father handed him in, or at least, told him to hand himself in.
The poor parents must be wondering where they went wrong. Not fair, but I'm sure parents think that way.
I would be asking myself that! I think that there are things parents do, in all innocence, that contribute to the way these people turn out. I think there needs to be a lot of study done, comparing the upbringings of as many as possible, and common denominators noted.
ReplyDeleteHulk Hogan's kids, a perfect example. Kids have to know there are consequences to every bad thing they do.
ReplyDelete